The Chromium of Silence: An Audit of Institutional Decay

This will be the new picture guitar picks. They’re on the way!

In the movie Erin Brockovich, the horror wasn’t just that there was poison in the water. The horror was that the utility company knew it was there, knew it was killing people, and spent millions of dollars telling the community it was safe to drink. They banked on the idea that if they had enough lawyers and enough awards on their walls, no one would look at the actual chemistry.

For the last year, I have been looking at the chemistry of Dorchester District Two. I am not a lawyer. I am an engineer, a father, and I’m trying to make things better. I look for root causes, stress fractures, and system failures. And what I have found is a history of institutional silence so toxic it rivals anything found in Hinkley, California.  I wish I could say that it’s special to only this school district, but later this year I’m sure we’ll be seeing more stories like this one.  This isn’t going to be a small event.

The Precedent of Inversion

To understand why the system failed Julian in 2024, you have to look at the data points from his time at Oakbrook Middle. The pattern was established early: protect the institution, ignore the aggressor, and silence the victim (typically with punishment).

Julian was subjected to multiple bullies and we reported physical assaults. The system’s response was negligible. When a child realizes that the "adults in the room" will not protect him, he instinctively tries to protect himself. Julian was caught with a weapon—a desperate, terrifying move for a child to make, but a logical one when you feel hunted. We foolishly thought that the problems had lessened, but Julian was just more careful to hide it.

Do we think that Julian was a saint?  Of course not; he had some issues but was overall well-adjusted and simply trying to get through school so that he could experience something on his own.  Like most of our kids want.

The district’s reaction was swift and absolute. He was prosecuted to the full extent of the law. Zero tolerance for weapons, and yet Julian was allowed to go back to his regular classes.  That showed that he was clearly not the issue, and “zero tolerance” is clearly lip service.

But here is where the data becomes severely corrupted. Like, sitcom level humor where the audience is supposed to react shocked. That same school year, one of the very bullies who tormented him—one of the reasons he felt the need for protection—was given a Citizenship Award.  Enter the “gasps” from the audience.

Let that sink in. The victim was prosecuted; the tormentor was celebrated. To the student body, the message was shock and awe. But the lesson was clear: The administration does not reward goodness; it rewards quiet compliance. If you torment someone quietly enough, you still get a trophy if you’re otherwise considered “good”. If you scream for help too loudly, you get the law.

The "Wait and See" Death Sentence

Fast forward to 2024. The cyberbullying reports. The cries for help.

The administration’s strategy had not changed: delay, deflect, silence. The official response to the cyberbullying was a "wait and see" approach. They waited. We saw.

Julian died.

The bullying likely stopped after his death, but let’s be very clear about the causality here. It didn’t stop because the school intervened. It didn’t stop because an administrator stepped in with a moral compass. It likely stopped because the bullies realized they had contributed to a tragedy. The silence of the bullies was born of guilt; the silence of the district was born of liability.

When pressed on this, the district claimed their investigation was "thorough." When asked how it was thorough, their legal counsel essentially argued that it was thorough because they said it was.

As an engineer, I can tell you: stating a conclusion is not the same as proving a process. "Because I said so" is not reasoning. It seems the district’s legal team needs a dictionary to understand that "reasoning" requires a logical bridge between premise and conclusion, not just a stamp of approval on a pile of inaction.

The Smoking Gun

But the true proof of the district’s commitment to burying the truth came with the Principal of the Year award.

Before the SCASA (South Carolina Association of School Administrators) applications were due, I sent a notification to the district. I reminded them of this unresolved situation. I framed their refusal to even discuss a Unity Day event proposal against the backdrop of this failure. The funny part is that I hadn’t even HEARD about the award at that point; I was just reminding the district that they had unanswered questions while I was trying to offer a Unity Day event for the district.

They knew. They had the notification in hand. They knew there was a “stain” attached to their "wait and see" policy. Julian was just a “stain” on the award.

And they processed the application anyway.

They looked at a year defined by a child’s suicide and an unresolved bullying investigation, and they decided this was a resume-builder. Of course a school can show improvement after a tragedy like this; how could they not? They claimed "transparency" on the application while actively working to bury the reality of what was happening in their hallways.

As of today, SCASA has not responded to me. Their silence is just another layer of the same insulation.

The First Amendment as a Filter

This is why the First Amendment exists. It is not there so we can discuss the weather. It is there to act as the final cap on a long history of institutional silence. It is the only tool we have to dredge the poison out of the water.

They want the last lines of dissent hushed. They want the parents to "sit down." They want the trophies to shine so brightly that no one notices the rust underneath.

But just like in Hinkley, the files don’t lie. The timeline doesn’t lie. And no matter how many awards they give themselves, they cannot change the fact that when a child cried out for help, they waited until it was too late.

We are done drinking the water. Now, we test it.

This is the “Love above ALL” design for Spooky Empire